Geertz, Clifford
1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. 中文翻譯有《文化的解釋》（簡體版）
1983 Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. 中文翻譯有《地方知識》（繁體版）
Ricoeur, Paul
1981 Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation, edited and translated by John B. Thompson. New York: Cambridge University Press. (ch1,5,8) 中文翻譯（簡體版）
1986 “Geertz,” in Lectures on Ideology and Utopia, George H. Taylor, ed. pp254-66. New York: Columbia University Press.
我們這週將聚焦在兩個主題上：
一是Paul Ricoeur的「文本詮釋學」（作者、理解、詮釋、文本）
二是Clifford Geertz的「文化」概念（文本analogy與「翻譯」、體系、ethos、深描、deep play（孝宏貼文））
2 則留言:
‘Understanding’, not ‘explaining’, “natives’ inner lives is more like grasping a proverb, catching an allusion, seeing a joke—or, as I have suggested, reading a poem—than it is like achieving communion.” Interpretive anthropology does not aim to know what native culture is, but this claim is not one of epistemological impossibility, but a methodological and conceptual shift in what culture is. Through deep play and thick description, ethnographic task of writing culture into texts, but text not as mere sentences on paper, but as systems of symbols and thus creating more space for interpretation.
For Ricoeur, the distinction between understanding (interpreting) and explanation is what differentiates social sciences and hard sciences. The project of understanding a text lays on the preliminary opposition between speech and writing. Writing takes place where speech is silent, or written because it is not said. Text as discourse fixed by writing emancipates and replaces the site of speech. The relationship between the speaker and interlocutor to that of author and writer is also different because there’s no dialogue but interception. The lack of direct engagement as a result of a upheaval of of the referential function or webs of signification is where the author and the authority of the ethnography manifests. For the reader, one can remain in the suspense of the text or return the text to dialogue.
Ricoeur on Levi-strauss on the myth of Oedipus...
Meaning full action considered as text...
Sorry, this is about as far as I got, just don’t have enough time to read and reflect…. With reading from last semester, I am more curious on the boarder theoretical framework, history of hermeneutics and how it relates to structuralism and post-structuralism i.e. Derrida. Would you also please briefly outline the role of language and interpretation in Heidegger, Gadamer, Ricoeur and Geertz.
Casinos near me, NJ - DRMCD
Find Casinos near me, 계룡 출장안마 NJ, USA that 파주 출장마사지 are 나주 출장샵 within reach of casinos 천안 출장안마 & hotels. We are your guide to casinos near you, NJ near you in 제천 출장안마 the
張貼留言